The Perennial Little Brother
A good friend and I went out for dinner last night, and had a nice long conversation. One thing that we discussed was the concept of “black and white” Christianity. To set the stage for where I’m coming from, I think that very few things in life are black and white. In fact, I would argue that a black and white approach to things is often very wrong, and has serious consequences.
Typically when people say black and white they associate it with conservatives. This is usually because conservatives are the most vocal about things that are wrong (i.e. drinking is wrong, smoking is wrong, dancing is wrong, etc.). In other words, they highlight the black (wrong) side of things. However, there is a counterpart to that which we aren’t nearly as hard on, and they are the liberals. This camp likes to say that lots of things are right (white). I think both are dangerous, for a variety of reasons.
(I should like to throw in a note: I do believe that some things are inherently wrong and some things are inherently right, but I am not referring to those. I am speaking to things like drinking, dancing, etc.)
Essentially what I look for is someone who has really wrestled through an issue, sought a Biblical reason for where they fall on the issue, and doesn’t look to judge someone who has a different view on the matter.
However, all of that is my back drop, and something I should write more about later. The point I want to talk about is the concept of the “perennial little brother”.
The perennial little brother is that individual that is the person we always cause to “stumble in their faith”. Paul warns us not to do things that would cause another to stumble. But we use this as a means to shackle us from being effective in our life.
So, for example, we are concerned about not causing anyone to stumble in their faith by us drinking. So we take the easy route and say we shouldn’t drink at all. Or, we say that smoking will cause someone to stumble, so we say smoking is wrong. In a sense, we build up countless rules and regulations to ensure that we don’t cause anyone else to stumble.
The idea is noble: to keep others from stumbling. But the issue is this, we build up rules that constrict us in ways that are not Biblical. Consider the example my friend told me. He had been in several churches that did not allow drinking, so he felt that he shouldn’t drink. He and his wife went to another couple’s house for dinner. They had a great opportunity to witness to this couple, and the couple had wine with dinner, and expected my friend and his wife to drink. The perennial little brother situation gives him no freedom to enjoy a nice glass of wine. Additionally, this makes him appear to be self-righteous and judgmental to this other couple. In other words, his witness is actually hurt by his inability to do things that aren’t inherently wrong, but someone else told him not to do because it might cause another to stumble.
Do you see the paradox that begins to unfold? Because we limit ourselves by the perennial little brother, we also limit our ability to impact the world around us. And I can hear the arguments already starting to fly: “But we are supposed to be in the world, not of the world” (being the main one I hear a lot). And yes, I agree, we should be in the world but not of the world.
So here’s the hitch in that argument. What did the pharisees say about Jesus? They called him a “drunkard” (which, by the way, Christ Himself noted that). He hung out with “sinners, tax collectors and prostitutes”. If Jesus were here today in the flesh, I bet you anything that He’d be hanging out at the bars, not sitting in the comfort of other Christians who don’t want to engage in those things to ensure we don’t cause the perennial little brother to stumble.
Ultimately, in my mind, it boils down to this. We are unwilling to really wrestle with the issues. We want the easy answer, the easy way out. And it’s never simple, it’s never easy. We have to look at the heart of the matter, we have to really investigate why we should or should not do something. Saying it might cause someone to stumble is a weak argument. While it has noble intentions, it is nothing more than a moral plea. And it is dangerous.
The caveat to that thought is this: you should be wary of causing others to stumble. But this needs to be on a case by case basis, not a blanket grouping of laws intended to shelter the perennial little brother. If you have a friend that struggles with alcoholism, then don’t drink in front of that friend. This doesn’t mean you can’t drink with other people.
Don’t let the perennial little brother hold you back. He cannot be an argument of why you do or don’t do something. Do consider those weaker in their faith, but do it in a personal, relational way. Don’t make blanket rules and regulations. Be willing to think, be willing to study the Scripture, be willing to pray.